As I type this, the Iowa caucuses are underway. Amazing that some 100,000 Iowans hold the sway that they do, but it is what it is. Seems appropriate to take some time to look at the field of contenders.
As I've indicated here before, I vote science. I'll certainly pay attention to a candidate's views on fiscal and social issues, but I've found their stance on (and knowledge of) science to be a pretty good litmus test. The economy, per my limited understanding, seems largely a black box - about all you can hope for is that a president will be smart enough to hire the best advisors possible and, then, get lucky. As for social issues, most intelligent, educated people land on the right side of those, if there's not too much money involved. So, the common theme - look for the smartest guy (or girl). Science IQ is a pretty good indicator.
Many of us have been disappointed with President Obama. For all the promise of three years ago, the actual product has not lived up to the hype - witness his recent signature on NPAA. But are there alternatives? Since Obama will doubtless receive the Democratic nomination, we're forced to look to the GOP. Surely someone in that crowded field can pass scientific muster.
Well, take a look. Scientific American's geek guide finds the most worthy of the Republican pack, from a scientific standpoint, to be Newt Gingrich. That's the same Gingrich who recently characterized evolution as producing "randomly gathered protoplasm". That's depressing. Of course, its unclear whether this reflects ignorance or cowardice on his behalf. But, then again, what's the difference.
The rest of the field is, believe it or not, worse. Mitt Romney, at least, accepts the fact of evolution. However, his stances on other scientific issues are completely utilitarian. And Ron Paul? Well, here's Ron Paul on evolution. For all my techno-geek, libertarian friends who think that Ron Paul is the second coming - he's not. Although I suppose he might have the good sense to keep his hands off things that he doesn't understand.
So, I guess I hope we're stuck with BHO for four more years.
well said my friend john!
ReplyDelete